banner



When Did Soft-bodied, Multi-celled Animals First Appear?

Structure and evolution of early multicellular organisms

The Precambrian dates from around 3850 to 542 million years ago. The Neoproterozoic is characterized by a large glaciation effect, followed by the appearance of the first multicellular torso plans before the Cambrian Explosion.

Until the late 1950s, the Precambrian was not believed to have hosted multicellular organisms. However, with radiometric dating techniques, it has been plant that fossils initially found in the Ediacara Hills in Southern Australia date dorsum to the belatedly Precambrian. These fossils are torso impressions of organisms shaped similar disks, fronds and some with ribbon patterns that were almost likely tentacles.

These are the earliest multicellular organisms in Earth's history, despite the fact that unicellularity had been effectually for a long time earlier that. The requirements for multicellularity were embedded in the genes of some of these cells, specifically choanoflagellates. These are thought to be the precursors for all animals. They are highly related to sponges (Porifera), which are the simplest multicellular animals.

In club to understand the transition to multicellularity during the Precambrian, it is important to look at the requirements for multicellularity—both biological and environmental.

Precambrian [edit]

The Precambrian dates from the beginning of Earth'south formation (4.6 billion years ago) to the beginning of the Cambrian Period, 539 meg years ago.[ane] [ii] The Precambrian consists of the Hadean, Archaean and Proterozoic eons.[one] Specifically, this commodity examines the Ediacaran, when the first multicellular bodies are believed to have arisen, as well as what acquired the rise of multicellularity.[three] This time catamenia arose after the Snowball Earth of the mid Neoproterozoic. The "Snowball Earth" was a menstruum of worldwide glaciation, which is believed to have served as a population bottleneck for the subsequent development of multicellular organisms.[4]

Precambrian bodies [edit]

The Globe formed effectually 4.vi billion years ago, with unicellular life emerging somewhat later after the cessation of the Late Heavy Bombardment, a menstruum of intense asteroid impacts possibly acquired past migration of the gas giant planets to their current orbits, however multicellularity and bodies are a relatively contempo event in Globe's history.[5] Bodies offset started actualization towards the end of the Precambrian Era, during the Ediacaran period. The fossils of the Ediacaran period were starting time establish in Southern Australia in the Ediacara Hills, hence the name. Nonetheless these fossils were initially thought to be function of the Cambrian and it wasn't until the late 1950s when Martin Glaessner identified the fossils as really being from the Precambrian era. The fossils that were establish date to about 600 1000000 years ago and are found in a variety of morphologies.[5]

Fossils of the Ediacaran [edit]

For more information, see Ediacaran biota.

The fossils establish that engagement dorsum to the Precambrian lack singled-out structures since there were no skeletal forms during this flow.[v] Skeletons did non arise until the Cambrian Flow when oxygen levels increased. This is considering skeletons require collagen, which uses Vitamin C as a cofactor, which requires oxygen.[6] For more data on the ascent of oxygen run into the section on oxygen. The bulk of fossils from this Era come from either Mistaken Point on the E Coast of Canada or the Ediacara Hills in Southern Australia.[five]

Nigh of the fossils are constitute equally impressions of soft-bodied organisms in the shape of disks, ribbons or fronds.[iii] [5] There are as well trace fossils that provide evidence that some of these Precambrian organisms were about-likely worm-like creatures that were locomotive.[vii] Most of these fossils lack whatsoever recognizable heads, mouths or digestive organs, and are thought to have fed via absorbent mechanisms and symbiotic relationships with chemoautotrophs (Chemotroph), photoautotrophs (Phototroph) or osmoautotrophs.[1] The ribbon-like fossils resemble tentacled organisms, and are thought to take fed by capturing prey. The frondose fossils resemble ocean pens and other cnidarians. The trace fossils suggest that there were annelid type creatures, and the deejay fossils resemble sponges. Despite these similarities, much of the identification is speculation since the fossils practice non bear witness very distinct structures. Other fossils exercise not resemble any known lineages.[1]

Many of the organisms, such as Charnia, found in Mistaken Point, were not like whatever organisms seen today. They had distinct bodies, however were lacking a caput and digestive regions. Rather their torso was organized in a very simple, fractal-like branching pattern.[8] Every element of the body was finely branched and grew by repetitive branching. This allowed the organism to take a large surface area and maximize nutrient absorption without needing a mouth and digestive system. However, there was minimal genetic information and therefore did non have the requirements that would have allowed them to evolve more efficient feeding techniques. This means they were probably outcompeted by other organisms, and thus became extinct.[8]

The organisms found in the Ediacaran Hills in Southern Australia displayed either radially symmetric body plans or, one organism, Spriggina, displayed the start bilateral symmetry. The Ediacaran Hills are idea to have in one case had a shallow reef where more light could penetrate the bottom of the ocean floor. This allowed for more diversity of organisms. The organisms institute here resemble relatives of the cnidarians, mollusks or annelids.[8]

Charnia [edit]

Charnia fossil found from Mistaken Betoken, Newfoundland, Canada

Charnia fossils were originally found in the Charnwood Woods in England, hence named Charnia.[8] These fossils are from marine organisms that lived on the lesser of the ocean flooring. The fossils have a fractal body plan and were frond shaped, significant they resembled wide-leafed plants such as ferns. However they could not have been plants since they resided in the nighttime depths of the sea floor. In Charnwood Forest, Charnia was found as an isolated species, however at that place were many more than fossils establish on the E Declension of Canada in Mistaken Point in Newfoundland. Charnia was attached to the lesser of the ocean floor, and was strongly current aligned. This is seen because there are deejay-like shapes at the bottom of the Charnia fossil, which show where Charnia was tethered, and all the nearby fossils are facing the aforementioned direction. These fossils at Mistaken Point were preserved well nether volcanic ash and layers of soft mud.[viii] It has been adamant via radiometric dating of the fossils that Charnia must accept lived around 565 million years ago.[iv] [9]

Dickinsonia [edit]

Body impression of Dickinsonia organism from the Precambrian Era

Dickinsonia fossils are another notable fossil from the Ediacaran menstruation, plant in Southern Australia and Russia.[ten] It remains unknown what blazon of organism Dickinsonia was; however, it has been considered a polychaete, turbellarian/annelid worm, jellyfish, polyp, protest, lichen or mushroom.[10] They were preserved in quartz sandstones, and appointment back to around 550 1000000 years ago. Dickinsonia were soft-bodied organisms, that show some evidence of very slow movement.[4] There are faint, circular imprints in the rock which follow a path, and then post-obit the aforementioned path there is a more definite round imprint of the same size. This indicates that the organism probably moved slowly from one feeding surface area to the next and absorbed nutrients. It is speculated that the organism probably had very pocket-sized appendages that allowed it to move much similar starfish practise today.[eleven]

Spriggina [edit]

This is the trunk impression of Spriggina, which lived during the Precambrian Era.

Spriggina fossils stand for the first known organisms with a bilaterally symmetric trunk plan. They had a head, tail and almost identical halves.[3] They probably had sensory organs in the caput and digestive organs in the tail which would have allowed them to find food more efficiently. They were capable of locomotion, which gave them an reward over other organisms from that era that were either tethered to the bottom of the ocean floor or moved very slowly. Spriggina was soft bodied, which leave the fossils as faint imprints. Information technology is most likely related to annelids, however at that place is some speculation that it could be related to arthropods since information technology somewhat resembles trilobite fossils.[iii] [5]

Trace fossils [edit]

The Ediacaran fossils of Southern Australia contain trace fossils, which betoken that there were motile benthic organisms. The organisms that produced the traces in the sediments were all worm-like sediment feeders or detritus feeders (Detritivore). There are a few trace fossils, which resemble arthropod trails. Evidence suggests that arthropod-like organisms existed during the Precambrian. This testify is in the type of trails left behind; specifically i specimen that shows six pairs of symmetrically placed impressions, which resemble trilobite walking trails.[seven]

Transition from unicellularity to multicellularity [edit]

For the bulk of World'south history life has been unicellular. Notwithstanding, unicellular organisms had the ingredients in them for multicellularity to arise. Despite having the ingredients for multicellularity, organisms were restricted due to the lack of hospitable environmental conditions. The ascension of oxygen (The Groovy Oxygenation Event) led organisms to be able to develop more than complex body plans. In order for multicellularity to take occurred, organisms must have been capable of cellular advice, aggregation, and specialized functions. The transition to multicellularity that began the evolution of animals from protozoa is 1 of the most poorly understood of history's life events. Understanding choanoflagellates and their relation to sponges is of import when positing theories on the origins of multicellularity[12]

Choanoflagellates [edit]

Choanoflagellates, also chosen "collar-flagellates" are unicellular protists that exist in both freshwaters and oceans.[13] Choanoflagellates have a spherical (or ovoid) cell body and a flagellum that is surrounded past a collar composed of actin microvilli.[xiii] [14] The flagellum is used to facilitate motility and nutrient intake. Every bit the flagellum beats, it takes in h2o through the microvilli fastened to the collar, which helps filter out unwanted bacteria and other tiny food particles.[13] Choanoflagellates are equanimous of approximately 150 species and reproduce by elementary division.[15]

Choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta [edit]

(besides known every bit Choanoflagellate Proterospongia)

The choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta is a rare freshwater eukaryote consisting of a number of cells embedded in a jelly-like matrix. This organism demonstrates a very primitive level of jail cell differentiation and specialization.[15] This is seen with flagellated cells and their collar structures that movement the cell colony through the water, while the amoeboid cells on the within serve to divide into new cells to assistance in colony growth.
Similar depression level cellular differentiation and specification can also exist seen in sponges. They as well have neckband cells (also called choanocytes due to their similarities to choanoflaggellates) and amoeboid cells arranged in a gelatinous matrix. Unlike choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta, sponges also accept other cell-types that can perform unlike functions (run across sponges). Also, the neckband cells of sponges beat within canals in the sponge body, whereas Salpingoeca rosetta's collar cells reside on the inside and information technology lacks internal canals. Despite these modest differences, there is strong testify that Proterospongia and Metazoa are highly related.[fifteen]

Choanoflagellate Perplexa [edit]

These choanoflagellates are able to attach to one another via the pairing of neckband microvilli.[xvi]

Choanoflagellate Codosiga Botrytis and Desmerella [edit]

These choanoflagellates are capable of forming colonies via fine intercellular bridges that let the individual cells to attach. These bridges resemble band canals that link developing spermatogonia or oogonia in animals.[16]

Sponges (Porifera) [edit]

Sponges are some of Globe's oldest and most ubiquitous animals. The appearance of sponge spicule fossils date back to the Precambrian Era around 580 million years ago.[17] An aggregation of these fossils were establish in the Doushanto formation in Southern China. Some circular impressions from the Ediacaran Hills in Southern Australia are besides reported to be sponges. They are i of the only lineages of metazoans from this era that keep to survive, and remain relatively unchanged.[17] [18] Sponges are such successful organisms due to their simple, yet constructive morphology. They do non possess mouths or any digestive, nervous or circulatory systems. Instead they are filter feeders, which means that they obtain food through nutrients in the water.[19] They have pores, chosen ostia, that water travels through to a sleeping room called the spongocoel, and exits through a chamber called the osculum.[19] Through this water filtration organization, they obtain nutrients that are needed for their survival. Specifically, they intracellularly digest bacteria, micro-algae or colloids.[20]

Sponge skeletons consist of either spongin or calcareous and siliceous spicules with some collagen molecules interspersed.[21] The collagen holds the sponge cells together. Different lineages of sponges are distinguished based on the composition of their skeletons. The three main classes of sponges are Demospongiae, Hexactinellid, and Calcareous.

Demonsponges are the most well-known type of sponge since they are used by humans. They are distinguished by a siliceous skeleton of two and 4 rayed spicules and comprise the protein spongin.

Hexactinellid are likewise called drinking glass sponges, and are distinguished past a six-rayed glass skeleton. These sponges are too capable of carrying out action potentials.

Calcareous sponges are characterized by a calcium carbonate skeleton and comprise less than 5% of sponges.[21]

Cells [edit]

Sponges take around 6 different types of cells that can perform dissimilar functions.[21] Sponges are a good model for studying the origin of multicellularity considering the cells are capable of communicating with ane another and re-aggregating. In an experiment conducted past Henry Van Peters Wilson in 1910, it was found that cells from dissociated sponges could send out signals and recognize each other to class a new individual.[22] This suggests that the cells that compose sponges are capable of contained living, even so once multicellularity was possible then aggregating together to form i organism was a more efficient fashion of living.


The nigh notable cell types of sponges are the goblet-shaped cells chosen choanocytes, so named for their similarity to choanoflagellates.[21] The similarities between these two cells types makes scientists believe that choanoflagellates are the sister taxa to metazoa. The flagella of these cells are what drive the h2o motion through the sponge torso.[23] The cell body of choanocytes is what is responsible for nutrient absorption. In some species these cells tin develop into gametes.[21]

The Pinacocytes are the cells on the exterior of the sponge that line the cell body. They are tightly packed together and very thin.[21]

The mesenchyme lines the region betwixt the pinacocytes and the choanocytes. They contain a matrix composed of proteins and spicules.[21]

Archaeocytes are special types of cells, in that they tin transform into all of the other cell types. They will do what is needed in the sponge body, such every bit ingest and digest food, send nutrients to other cells in the sponge body. These cells are also capable of developing into gametes in some sponge species.[21]

The sclerocytes are responsible for the secretion of spicules. In species of sponges that apply spongin instead of calcaerous and silicaceous spicules, the sclerocytes are replaced by spongocytes, which secrete spongin skeletal fibres.[21]

The myocytes and porocytes are responsible for contraction of the sponge. These contractions are coordinating to muscle contractions in other organisms, since sponges exercise not accept muscles. They are responsible for regulating the water flow through the sponge.[21]

The formation of multicellularity [edit]

The germination of multicellularity was a pivotal point in the development of life on Earth. Soon later on multicellularity arose, in that location was an immense increase in the diversity of living organisms at the beginning of the Cambrian Era, called the Cambrian Explosion. Multicellularity is believed to have evolved multiple times on Globe because information technology was a beneficial life strategy for organisms.[24] For multicellularity to occur, cells demand to be capable of self-replication, cell-cell adhesion and cell-cell advice. There besides must take been available oxygen and selective pressures in the environment.

Theory of cellular sectionalization: S. Rosetta [edit]

Piece of work past Fairclough, Dayel and King suggests that South. Rosetta can exist in either unmarried-cellular form or in colonies of four-50 cells, which arrange themselves in tight knit packs of spheres.[xvi] This was established by performing an experiment involving the introduction of prey bacterium Algoriphagus species to a sample of uni-celled S. Rosetta organism and monitored the activity for 12 hours. Results of this study demonstrated that cell colonies were formed through cell-division of the initial alone S. Rosetta cell rather than by cell aggregation. Farther studies to back up the theory of cell-proliferation were washed by introducing so removing the drug aphidicolin which serves to cake cell-sectionalization. When the drug was introduced, cell division stopped and colony germination resulted through prison cell-prison cell aggregation. When the drug was removed, cell-division dominated once again.[16]

Building blocks for jail cell-adhesion [edit]

By looking at the genome of the Choanoflagellate, "Monosiga brevicollis", scientists accept inferred that choanoflagellates play a key role in the development of multicellularity.[13] Nicole Rex has done work looking at the genome of Monisiga brevicollis, and has found primal poly peptide domains that are shared between metazoans and choanoflagellates. These domains play a role in prison cell signalling and adhesion processes in metazoans. The finding that choanoflagellates besides have these genes is an incredible discovery because it was previously idea that but metazoans had genes responsible for cell-cell advice and aggregation. This suggests that these domains play a key role in the origins of multicellularity since it ties a unicellular organism (choanoflagellates) to multicellular organisms (metazoans). It shows that the components required for multicellularity were present in the common ancestor betwixt metazoans and choanoflagellates.[xiii]

Jail cell signaling and cell advice [edit]

Neither sponges nor the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens appear to be equipped with neuron synapses, still they both possess several factors related to the same synaptic role.[25] Therefore, it is likely that central features involved in synaptic transmission arose early in metazoan evolution, most probable around the fourth dimension that much of the life on Earth was transitioning to multicellularity. Information technology was institute that the Munc18/syntaxin 1 complex could be an important component for the product of the SNARE poly peptide. The secretion of SNARE protein from synaptic vesicles is believed to be disquisitional for neuronal communication. The Munc18/syntaxin 1 complex institute in M. brevicollis is both structurally and functionally similar to the metazoan complex. This suggests that it constitutes an important step in the reaction pathway toward SNARE associates. It is believed that the common antecedent of choanoflagellates and metazoans used this primordial secretion mechanism equally a forerunner to synaptic communication. This machinery would eventually be used for jail cell-prison cell communication in animals.[25]

Reasons for the development of multicellularity [edit]

Despite the fact that prokaryotic cells contained the building blocks required for multicellularity to ascend, this transition did not occur for around 1500 million years subsequently the origins of the first eukaryotic cell.[12] Scientists have proposed two major theories for the reason that multicellularity arose so late after the appearance of life on Globe.

Predation theory for multicellularity [edit]

This theory postulates that multicellularity arose every bit a means for casualty to escape predation. Larger prey are less likely to be preyed upon, and larger predators are more likely to catch prey. Therefore information technology is likely that multicellularity arose when the first predators evolved. By assembling as a larger, multicelled organism, casualty could escape the attempts of a predator.[12] Therefore multicellularity was selectively favoured over unicellularity. This can be seen in a uncomplicated experiment conducted by Boraas et al. (1998).[26] When a predatory protist, Ochromonas valencia, was introduced to a prey population of Chlorella vulgaris, it was seen that inside less than 100 generations of the prey species a multicellular growth form of the alga became dominant. This is interesting considering before the predator was introduced, the population of Chlorella vulgaris retained its unicellular growth grade for thousands of generations. It is likely that it would take remained unicellular indefinitely if the selective pressure that was induced by the predators had not been introduced. After multiple generations with the predator, the algal species retained a growth grade of 8-10 cells, which was big enough to avoid the predator, just modest enough that each prison cell still had access to nutrients.[26] This predator-casualty relationship provides a likely reason for why information technology was benign for organisms to exist multicellular.

Rising in oxygen levels theory for multicellularity [edit]

Despite the fact that organisms had the potential to go multicellular it is likely that information technology was not actually possible until the tardily Neoproterozoic. This is because multicellularity requires oxygen, and before the tardily Neoproterozoic there was very limited oxygen availability.[12] After the melting of the "Snowball Earth" during the mid Neoproterozoic, nutrients that were trapped in the ice flooded the oceans.[8] Surviving bacteria flourished due to the increased nutrient levels. Among these microbes were cyanobacteria and other oxygen producing bacteria, which led to the massive ascension in oxygen levels. The increased oxygen availability allowed it to be used by cells in order to manufacture collagen. Collagen is the primal component for prison cell aggregation, It is a rope-similar molecule that "ties" cells together. Oxygen is required for collagen synthesis considering ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) is essential for this process to occur.[half dozen] A key component in the ascorbic acid molecule is oxygen (chemic formula C6HviiiO6).[27] Therefore, it is evident that the ascension in oxygen is a crucial step to the rise of multicellularity since information technology is essential for the synthesis of collagen.[8]

Edifice blocks found in both sponges and humans [edit]

Collagen [edit]

Collagen is the most abundant protein in mammals and is an essential molecule in the formation of bones, skin and other connective tissue. Unlike types of collagen have been found in all multicellular organisms, including sponges.

Information technology has been found that sponges do have a gene sequence coding for collagen blazon IV which is a diagnostic feature of the basal lamina.[28]

It has also been constitute that 29 types of collagen have been plant to exist in humans. This vast group can further be divided into several families co-ordinate to their primary structures and supramolecular system. Among the many types of collagens, only the fibrillar and the basement membrane (blazon IV) collagens have been found in the sponges and cnidarians, which are the two primeval branching metazoan lineages. Studies take focused on the origin of fibrillar collagen molecules. In Sponges, there be three clades of fibrillar molecules, A, B and C. Information technology is proposed that only the B clade fibrillar collagens preserved their characteristic modular structure from sponge to human.[29]

In mammals, the fibrillar collagens involved in the formation of cross-striated fibrils are types I–Three, Five, and XI. Blazon II and type XI collagens compose the fibrils nowadays in cartilage. These can be distinguished from collagens located in non-cartilaginous tissues, which include type I, 3, and V collagens.[29]

Protein [edit]

Additional research on sponge proteins found that of 42 sponge proteins that were analysed, all of them had homologous proteins that are plant in humans. An identity score of 53% was given to the similarity amid sponge and human proteins, compared to a score of 42% when the same sequence was compared to that of C. elegans.[30]

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Valentine, J.W (1994). "Late Precambrian bilaterians: grades and clades". Proceedings of the National University of Sciences. 91 (xv): 6751–6757. Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.6751V. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.15.6751. PMC44279. PMID 8041693.
  2. ^ "Stratigraphic Chart 2022" (PDF). International Stratigraphic Committee. February 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2022.
  3. ^ a b c d Erwin, Douglas; Valentine, James; Jablonski, David (1997). "The Origin of Body Plans: Recent fossil finds and new insights into animal development are providing fresh perspectives on the riddle of the explosion of animals during the Early Cambrian". American Scientist. 85: 126–137.
  4. ^ a b c Narbonne, Guy; Gehling, James (2003). "Life subsequently snowball: The oldest circuitous Ediacaran fossils" (PDF). Geology. 31 (1): 27–30. Bibcode:2003Geo....31...27N. doi:ten.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0027:lastoc>ii.0.co;two. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-10-31.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Glaessner, Martin (1959). "The Oldest Fossil Faunas of Due south Australia" (PDF). Geologische Rundschau. 47 (two): 522–531. Bibcode:1959GeoRu..47..522G. doi:10.1007/bf01800671. S2CID 140615593.
  6. ^ a b Towe, Kenneth (1970). "Oxygen-Collagen Priority and the Early Metazoan FossilRecord". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 65 (4): 781–788. Bibcode:1970PNAS...65..781T. doi:10.1073/pnas.65.4.781. PMC282983. PMID 5266150.
  7. ^ a b Glaessner, Martin (1969). "Trace fossils from the Precambrian and basal Cambrian". Lethaia. 2 (4): 369–393. doi:x.1111/j.1502-3931.1969.tb01258.ten.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Attenborough, David. "First Life". YouTube.
  9. ^ Antcliffe, Jonathan; Brasier, Martin (2008). "Charnia at 50: Developmental Models for Ediacaran Fronds". Palaeontology. 51 (i): 1475–4983. doi:ten.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00738.x.
  10. ^ a b Retallack, Gregory (2007). "Growth, decay and burial compaction of Dickinsonia, an iconic Ediacaran fossil". Alcheringa. 31 (3): 215–240. doi:10.1080/03115510701484705. S2CID 17181699.
  11. ^ Sperling, Erik; Vinther, Jakob (2010). "A placozoan analogousness for Dickinsonia and the development of late Proterozoic metazoan feeding modes". Evolution & Development. 12 (2): 201–209. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00404.x. PMID 20433459. S2CID 38559058.
  12. ^ a b c d Rex, Nicole (September 2004). "The Unicellular Ancestry of Animal Development" (PDF). Developmental Cell. 7 (3): 313–325. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.010. PMID 15363407.
  13. ^ a b c d e King, Nicole; et al. (2008). "The genome of the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis and the origin of metazoans". Nature. 451 (7180): 783–788. Bibcode:2008Natur.451..783K. doi:10.1038/nature06617. PMC2562698. PMID 18273011.
  14. ^ King, Nicole; Carrol, Sean B. (September 10, 2001). "A receptor tyrosine kinase from choanoflagellates: Molecular insights into early animate being development". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of america of America. 98 (26): 15032–15037. Bibcode:2001PNAS...9815032K. doi:10.1073/pnas.261477698. PMC64978. PMID 11752452.
  15. ^ a b c Waggoner, Ben. "Introduction to the Choanoflagellata: Where it all began for the animals". UCMP Berkeley. Berkeley.
  16. ^ a b c d Dayel, Marking; Alegado, Rosanna; Fairclough, Stephen; Levin, Tera; Nichols, Scott; McDonald, Kent; King, Nicole (September 2011). "Jail cell differentiation and morphogenesis in the colony-forming choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta". Developmental Biology. 357 (i): 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.06.003. PMC3156392. PMID 21699890.
  17. ^ a b Li, Chia-Wei; Chen, Jun-Yuan; Hua, Tzu-En (February 1998). "Precambrian sponges with cellular structures". Science. 279 (5352): 879–882. Bibcode:1998Sci...279..879L. doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.879. PMID 9452391.
  18. ^ Gehling, James; Rigby, Keith (1996). "Long expected sponges from the Neoproterozoic Ediacara fauna of Southward Australia". Journal of Paleontology. 70 (2): 185–195. doi:ten.1017/S0022336000023283. JSTOR 1306383.
  19. ^ a b Collins, Allen Yard.; Waggoner, Ben. "Porifera: More on Morphology". UCMP Berkeley. Berkeley.
  20. ^ Dupont, Samuel; Corre, Erwan; Li, Yanyan; Vacelet, Jean; Bourguet-Kondracki, Marie-Lise (Dec 2013). "Start insights into the microbiome of a cannibal sponge". FEMS Microbiology Environmental. 86 (three): 520–531. doi:ten.1111/1574-6941.12178. PMID 23845054.
  21. ^ a b c d e f thou h i j Collins, Allen G. "Porifera: The Cells". UCMP Berkeley. Berkeley.
  22. ^ Larroux, Claire; et al. (2006). "Developmental expression of transcription factor genes in a demosponge: insights into the origin of metazoan multicellularity". Evolution and Development. 8 (2): 150–173. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142x.2006.00086.x. PMID 16509894. S2CID 36836333.
  23. ^ Myers, Phil. "Porifera Sponges". Brute Diversity Spider web.
  24. ^ Iwasa, Janet; Szostak, Jack. "A Timeline of Life'south Evolution". Exploring Life's Origins.
  25. ^ a b Buckhardt, Pawel; et al. (August two, 2011). "Primordial neurosecretory apparatus identified in the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Usa of America. 108 (37): 15264–15269. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10815264B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1106189108. PMC3174607. PMID 21876177.
  26. ^ a b Boraas, Martin; Seale, Dianne; Boxhorn, Joseph (1998). "Phagotrophy by a flagellate selects for colonial prey: A possible origin of multicellularity". Evolutionary Ecology. 12 (2): 153–164. doi:x.1023/A:1006527528063. S2CID 12298325.
  27. ^ Naidu, Akhilender (2003). "Vitamin C in human health and affliction is withal a mystery ? An overview". Nutrition Journal. 2 (vii): 7. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-two-vii. PMC201008. PMID 14498993.
  28. ^ Tyler, Seth (2003). "Epithelium—the primary building cake for metazoan complication". Integrative and Comparative Biological science. 43 (1): 55–63. doi:x.1093/icb/43.i.55. PMID 21680409.
  29. ^ a b Exposito, Jean-Yves; Larroux, Claire; Cluzel, Caroline; Valcourt, Ulrich; Lethias, Claire; Degnan, Bernard (2008). "Demosponge and Sea Anemone Fibrillar Collagen Diversity Reveals the Early Emergence of A/C Clades and the Maintenance of the Modular Structure of Type Five/11 Collagens from Sponge to Human". The Journal of Biological Chemical science. 283 (42): 28226–28235. doi:x.1074/jbc.M804573200. PMC2661393. PMID 18697744.
  30. ^ Gamulin, Vera; Muller, Isabel; Muller, Werner (2008). "Sponge proteins are more than similar to those of Homo sapiens than to Caenorhabditis elegans". Biological Periodical of the Linnean Guild. 71 (iv): 821–828. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01293.x.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precambrian_body_plans

Posted by: haasaftess.blogspot.com

0 Response to "When Did Soft-bodied, Multi-celled Animals First Appear?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel